Browsing the FORS list (in General)

AdminQBGentlemanLoser [{END}] May 15 2005 1:53 PM EDT

And number 13 stuck in my mind.

"Q: Mage staffs would be cool to augment magical power!
A: private explained why this is dumb with more patience than I would:

Tanks: Can become more powerful than mages, but cost lots of money to maintain. Mages: Tend to be cheaper than tanks, but also tend to be less powerful (and less able to deal with armor penalties)
I think this provides a nice balance between spending money on your chars and spending exp on them; I see no reason to change it."

With the recent armour changes, doesn't a CoI do exaclty this thing?

Granted, making a weapon that does the same (with a proportionally high upgrade cost..) might be taking advantage of the "no added pr for weapons up to x" property, but in essence (and apart from the equipment slot used), what makes a CoI now different to a mage staff?

Nixon Jibfest May 15 2005 2:04 PM EDT

I don't think the idea of a Mage staff is really "R" but just something that had been brought up plenty of times before. I always thought it was a good idea. Mages are cash cows so they need something to dump the money on.

AdminJonathan May 15 2005 4:22 PM EDT

the difference is one of degree
This thread is closed to new posts. However, you are welcome to reference it from a new thread; link this with the html <a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=001LJ5">Browsing the FORS list</a>