Possible multi again (in Public Record)


DrAcO5676 [The Knighthood III] January 12 2006 7:54 AM EST

Bon Jon (Ju Ju) 165.21.154.17 kazuma (Super Speed) 165.21.154.17
Check out both of there names and you will see that at one time Bon Jon was known as Superspeed. Yet Kazuma has a character known as Super Speed. Worth a look.

QBJohnnywas January 12 2006 8:14 AM EST

It does look suspect. If it is true, I especially like the donation to G-Wolf's fund....

bartjan January 12 2006 11:10 AM EST

When will people learn to check the Character transfer log?

Anyway, Bon Jon is banned for being an unrelated multi, of Manson.

DrAcO5676 [The Knighthood III] January 12 2006 7:11 PM EST

Actually I did take a look at the Transfer logs but I figured the most damning evidence was the names.

bartjan January 13 2006 3:21 AM EST

If you have seen the transfer log, then there would have been nothing special about the names. The character 'Super Speed' was created by a user called 'Superspeed'. He would not be the only first one that has a character with the same name as his account...

DrAcO5676 [The Knighthood III] January 13 2006 3:44 AM EST

Look again Bart then tell me that the same person had a character named Super Speed and his name was Superspeed. You are wrong on that count. Like I had said at my beginning post Kazuma has a character named Super Speed, Whilst Bon Jon was first called SuperSpeed before he changed his name. Thanks for your time....
DrAcO

bartjan January 13 2006 3:51 AM EST

From character transfer log:
Bon Jon kazuma Super Speed January 12 2006 6:58 AM EST

This means that the user 'Bon Jon' used to own the character 'Super Speed' until January 12.

From Bon Jon's user page:
superspeed until January 12 2006 7:16 AM EST

This means that up until January 12 there was a user 'superspeed' with a character called 'Super Speed'. Nothing strange, I think.
This thread is closed to new posts. However, you are welcome to reference it from a new thread; link this with the html <a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=001fT2">Possible multi again</a>