For all those that have issues with me, I've taken the liberty of ghost writing a letter that you may write to me at your leisure :)
(This is meant as a jest to lighten the mood around here...)
My complaint about Sir N S NightStrike, Esq.
Sir N S NightStrike, Esq.'s particular brand of statism will incite racial hatred before long, but that's not the point of this letter. The point is that his incessant jactancy is really getting on my nerves. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Sir NightStrike's money-grubbing indoctrination and is consequently believable.
Sir NightStrike's goals are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, Sir NightStrike says that his wheelings and dealings are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? Some people think it's a bit extreme of me to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish -- a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that just because Sir NightStrike and his toadies don't like being labelled as "ridiculous meatheads" or "ignominious layabouts" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. In order to convince us that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless, Sir NightStrike often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Be honest; can you in any way believe his claim that anyone who dares to help young people develop the ability to make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result? I cannot, mainly because if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that his holier-than-thou attitudes reflect an era in which cultures or attitudes different from one's own were dealt with through violence and mistrust. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. With Sir NightStrike's allegations hanging over us like the Sword of Damocles, it makes sense that Sir NightStrike likes to lead to the destruction of the human race. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Sir NightStrike and his lieutenants will run for cover, like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must reveal some shocking facts about Sir NightStrike's outbursts.
A trip to your local library would reveal that a real fight against lame-brained revanchism can be undertaken only if a basic change in social conditions makes it possible to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. Sir NightStrike may mean well but his traducements are not modeled on democracy as envisaged by philosophers of the Enlightenment, but on the anti-democratic principles of cameralism. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why Sir NightStrike's hastily mounted campaigns can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that Sir NightStrike says that he has his moral compass in tact. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd unquestionably prevent anyone from hearing that a colleague recently informed me that a bunch of stultiloquent flag burners and others in Sir NightStrike's amen corner are about to weaken family ties. I have no reason to doubt that story because Sir NightStrike is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, he frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior, such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to defuse or undermine incisive critiques of his vile behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. What we're involved in with Sir NightStrike is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it.
Sir NightStrike is so self-absorbed that he transcends the normal definition of that word into a whole new meaning that also encompasses "caustic" and "execrable". Enough said. Some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, compassion and moral principle are not the main motives for his actions. But the problems with his sophistries don't end there.
What Sir NightStrike does in private is none of my business. But when he tries to turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals, I object. There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Sir NightStrike.
For those of us who make our living trying to address a number of important issues, it is important to consider that his magic-bullet explanations are very much in line with unprofessional scapegoatism in that they shower counter-productive charlatans with undeserved encomia. That said, let me continue. I apologize if the following points are hard to follow but they're quite relevant to the gist of my argument. First, the deep-seated, unbridled hatred that Sir NightStrike's fans have for us is visceral and inculcated from cradle to grave. And second, Sir NightStrike ducks the issue of prætorianism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all. All of this means, of course, that now that I've been exposed to Sir NightStrike's values, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps Sir NightStrike wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that many people are shocked when I tell them that Sir NightStrike often compares himself to Jesus, usually on the grounds that I'm trying to crucify him for speaking the truth. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that if stoicism were an Olympic sport, Sir NightStrike would clinch the gold medal. Never before have I encountered more bloatedly self-important prose than that which Sir NightStrike produces. While there is no evidence that aside from a few exceptions, this statement is doubtlessly valid, it is clear that he has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Sir NightStrike himself). Then again, just because he is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that the media should "create" news rather than report it.
I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing Sir NightStrike of planning to utilize questionable and illegal fund-raising techniques. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that I correctly predicted that he would create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate, but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively -- or so soon. We must face the fact that a large percentage of his faithfuls can be termed wanton. That's the sort of statement that some people insist is humorless, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because he has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. Sir NightStrike dreams of a time when he'll be free to muster enough force to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. That's the way he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen, but will happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't give our young people the values that will inspire them to reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community. It may seem to many people, maybe even the majority, that he is doing everything in his power to make me become increasingly frustrated, humiliated and angry. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance.
Sir NightStrike claims to be fighting for equality. What he's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Sir NightStrike's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of morals. Others are in the form of expostulations. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. All I can tell you is what matters to me: Some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with clumsy jerks on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to change children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic by the most closed-minded urban guerrillas you'll ever see. If Sir NightStrike wants to con us into believing that his assertions are all sweetness and light, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision.
I challenge all of the maledicent buggers out there to consider this: Unlike Sir NightStrike, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- he were not actually responsible for trying to extend his 15 minutes of fame to 15 months, then I'd stop saying that Sir NightStrike is not only naive but is addicted to being naive. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. Contrary to the impression that the worst kinds of juvenile, hostile stool pigeons there are offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their quips. Before Sir NightStrike initiated a paternalism flap to help promote his sinful analects, people everywhere were expected to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that every time Sir NightStrike tries, he gets increasingly successful in his attempts to insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well.
I speak from experience. I'm not going to say why; we all know the reason. It has been a long-standing observation of mine that Sir NightStrike suffers from a pathology of delusion. And if that seems like a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical claim of all. This is not the first time I've wanted to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by him and his sycophants. But it is the first time I realized that I wonder if he really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that he is stepping over the line when he attempts to eavesdrop on all types of private conversations -- way over the line. Some people have compared wretched flibbertigibbets to rabid traitors. I would like to take the comparison one step further: If there's an untold story here, it's that I undoubtedly feel that Sir NightStrike's strictures have an unsavory historical track record. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that the problem with him is not that he's satanic. It's that he wants to break the mind and spirit, castrate the character, and kill the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be incorrigible. Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: If the word "unextinguishableness" occurs to the reader, he or she may recall that Sir N S NightStrike, Esq. once tried to engage in the trafficking of human beings.