Nice to see Apple consistent in their practices.
Also, just read that a cheaper iPhone will be available before the end of the year, for about 300 USD based on the iPod Nano.
The iPhone battery will only survive about 300-400 recharges, the company says. Because the unit is sealed, consumers can't swap out dead batteries. Instead, dead phones must be sent to Apple, where battery replacement will take three business days and cost $79 plus a $6.95 shipping charge. Those who can't live without their cell phones for those three days can rent a spare iPhone for $29.
-Considering the iPhone was clearly intended to be used as more than a normal cell phone, why would Apple use a battery with such a short life-cycle (assuming the article is correct)? I was under the impression that Apple took a lot of grief over iPod battery issues, most specifically about the inability of users to swap out batteries on their own. It just seems...stupid.