Why don't we just have it cut to 10/30, 9/30/ 8/30, 7/30, and 6/30 and triple our rewards or something? :P
Flamey
July 19 2007 8:41 AM EDT
Because we should throw Seran into a raging river. :P
bartjan
July 19 2007 9:08 AM EDT
It used to be 10/5, ages ago.
bartjan
July 19 2007 9:22 AM EDT
Yes. And before that, there was no BA ;)
I like the rate right now... I can't imagine getting 7/30 minutes =/
th00p
July 19 2007 5:24 PM EDT
If BA regen was cut in half...
It would be 10/40, 9/40, 8/40, 7/40, and 6/40. Not /30.
Also, why would we cut BA regen in half and triple rewards? That sounds way too good to be true =)
He meant "if BA regen was cut in half" (referring to before) then why not make the refresh x/30 and triple our old rewards.
1 MINUTE 1
July 19 2007 6:36 PM EDT
"Yes. And before that, there was no BA ;)"
No BA how did that work?
48Zach
July 19 2007 6:36 PM EDT
Fight as much as you want! :D
Then Todd decided to try a program called "Keytext". Due to this, bot checks were introduced.
th00p
July 19 2007 8:16 PM EDT
"He meant "if BA regen was cut in half" (referring to before) then why not make the refresh x/30 and triple our old rewards."
Because it doesn't make sense to force some people to wait for 13 hours for one full set of BA.
Lord Bob
July 20 2007 5:52 PM EDT
The BA regen is fine right where it is.
If anything I think the BA regen rate should be speeded up to about 10/10 if not faster - faster regen means more people sticking around in chat waiting for more BA.
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002ATV">If BA regen was cut in half...</a>
