Evasion stats for AoI/RoBF/DB stacking combinations.
AoI: no matter what, added 0 minus to hit. When used by itself, the evasion field was blank.
RoBF: 32 by itself. Its NW is 34M. 1/3rd of 34M in translates to +88 DBs.
DBs: +82 named, so it -should- be granting 86. Log shows 85 for some reason.
RoBF + DBs: 89.
There are two choices for named DB/RoBF stackage.
Choice 1a: Named DBs are treated as the DB size they function as.
+32 DBs: 917,142
+85 DBs: 10,256,868
total NW: 11,174,010
Final value: +87
Choice 1b: The boots are actually treated as +86.
+86 DBs: 10,559,303
total NW: 11,476,445
Final value: +88
Choice 2: The unnamed PTH is used, then the naming bonus is applied postcombination.
+82 DBs: 9,380,998
Total NW: 10,298,140
Final value: +85
After naming: +89 (assuming correct naming bonus, 88 if not)
So assuming the second choice AND that the +82 DBs are actually being treated as +86, rather than the displayed +85, stacking appears to be working correctly. Since I used the exact values of equivalent DBs rather than the unknown exact amount of NW granted by the RoBF, the - error in both choices may lie there. The issue remains that the AoI grants nothing at all in terms of minus to hit.
Summary:
Bug 1: RoBF evasion is some paltry 2.7% of the total NW. Well known.
Bug 2: AoI doesn't grant the advertised -20 in any context--not even by itself.
Bug 3: Inaccuracy in the RoBF + DB final - value. Most likely a result of what I stated above.
Bug 4: My +82 named DBs display as 85 evasion, rather than 86. Perhaps Jon made some rounding down error in the evasion display calculation?
