Encumb vs. Encumb 0.0 (in General)
May 4 2008 2:18 AM EDT
*Anyone know why ENC sometimes shows nothing, and sometimes shows 0.0? What's the difference and why is it important to show 0.0; or is it just a stupid waste of space?
In the second P-bs I have one less AC and evasion, and my ST/DX stats are crippled. The character Bleys has a 1.8M EC which would put me at 1.9M ST/DX.
Total Evasion 135
Damage Inflicted 5,112,266
Ammo remaining 641,168
Total Evasion 134
Damage Inflicted 2,230,053
Ammo remaining 641,143
May 4 2008 2:47 AM EDT
May 4 2008 7:15 AM EDT
You're most likely fighting somebody with EC trained (2+ mil effect by the looks of it).
Your dropped ST makes you *barely* reach the encumbrance limit, as shown by the 1/234 drop in AC... you're getting a roughly 0.004 encumbrance penalty, which does indeed round up to display as 0.00
May 4 2008 7:24 AM EDT
"The character Bleys has a 1.8M EC which would put me at 1.9M ST/DX."
If you were reading that off the "character attribute" stats list, you should know it lists trained level, not effective level. He also has a named Corn equipped.
Enable play-by-play and look how much he actually casts the EC at.
Or, alternatively, if that's the number you get from play-by-play, then it's some sort of display bug... because you do suffer from an effect of 2.27+ mil EC
"Brand cast Ethereal Chains on all enemy Minions (1819058)"
That's from PBP. And if he didn't have the MgS, PL, AMF, SoD, or MH, I so woulda pwned the newest member of the 6/20 club... :P
May 4 2008 7:02 PM EDT
Then there's something wrong... either with the display in PBP (could be EC value is displayed incorrectly when named corn is involved, it's a long shot, but you never know) or with the encumbrance ST/DX penalty calculation (unlikely, since AC is affected just the way it should be, but again, could be).
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002QZL">Encumb vs. Encumb 0.0</a>