When it comes to Gun's latest user picture... (in Off-topic)

The conversation that follows will have me laughing for days:


<deifeln2> xD
<deifeln2> Gun's picture is downright offensive ;p
<deifeln7> real gun or imposter gun?
<deifeln2> lol, the only gun
<DH> WOW
<DH> it totally is offensive
<deifeln7> I know
<deifeln7> any idiot knows that flesh has terrible stopping power
<deifeln2> bahahahaha
<deifeln7> he's misleading us with false safety advice


I love chat.

I'm not an impostor. X(

lol that picture is great. I assume we're talking about [CB1]Gun's picture of Meatshiled (sic)

and Mistgun, you're not Gun, you're not Gerard, who are you? :P

+5

I'm still confused by all the deifelns XD

But the picture looks more like he's saving the kid to me. Eh. We all know that Gun has questionable morals. It's one of those, depends on how you take it. the quote is very specific though and that part is offensive >.>

It would be much funnier if "Meatshield" was spelled correctly.

I always hold children I'm saving in the line of fire

I don't see him getting shot at, or any indication there is actual "combat." =P

/agree meso; it's entirely possible he's just carrying that kid around :)

lol I think it's pretty funny ^^

Rofl! Pretty funny. :)

Hold him higher! You gotta protect your head from the snipers!

I'm pretty sure I've seen that picture before. He was rescuing that child, and they were out of combat. The soldier wasn't really using him as a meat shield. That would be just plain evil.

Awww... you guys are too serious!! You're sucking all the funny-ness out! No analyzing jokes!! ;p

Sorry...

It would be funny, but messed up.

It is clear to me that the child IS being used as a meatshield. If he was saving him, why would he be carrying him in one arm, protecting his torso, with the other holding his gun? This is clearly a block-and-strafe technique in action.