srsly guys? i mean honestly (in General)

Untouchable May 29 2009 7:39 PM EDT

shouldnt Vampiric Aura be a skill?
wouldnt it fit better there aswell?

and not only that but it would force players to have to give up Archery to use. A skill for defensive teams not offensive

AdminQBnovice [Cult of the Valaraukar] May 29 2009 7:41 PM EDT

the name would have to be changed... but yes

Add to this the return of Steel Skin as a skill and I think we've got the beginning of a glorious changemonth.

A Lesser AR of 15 [Red Permanent Assurance] May 29 2009 8:05 PM EDT

+3 Untouchable.

Should be a skill and fine time bringing the issue forefront.

{WW]Nayab [Cult of the Valaraukar] May 29 2009 8:06 PM EDT

Vampiric Touch
You gain hp equal to a percentage of the damage you deal.

iBananco [Blue Army] May 29 2009 8:17 PM EDT

Then make it work for magic and ranged!

{CB1}Sparticus [Screwed Justice] May 29 2009 8:50 PM EDT

I disagree with the magic part.
a single Tank/archer needs to train Str,Dex,HP,+skill, while magic with Vamp would only require a single mage to train a DD and HP +skill. Maybe if it worked at a lesser rate like 2/3rds of whatever the Physical Damage aspect of Vampiric Aura would recieve, That might even it out some.

PearsonTritonRaveshaw May 29 2009 10:03 PM EDT

VA is hardly used as it is. I don't see a problem with it. Sure it's dispelled very easily, but that's part of the game. If you turn it into a skill then you give up using bloodlust and then it's pretty much pointless to do because you are not doing enough damage unless you invest a lot of USD into your weapon.
This thread is closed to new posts. However, you are welcome to reference it from a new thread; link this with the html <a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002mGJ">srsly guys? i mean honestly</a>