Lewd Bot Checks (in General)

I just got;


:D

Priceless!

What other lewd bot checks has anyone else got (Nice/Big Jugs comes up a bit)

we really can't talk about this... but i have seen my fair share of them

If they come up in a bot check, they're fair game for the forums. ;)

(I had to save Fist // Rear, for posterity. ;) )

Actually no they are not. There have been sever threads like this and they were closed and some people fined.

Excellent.

Another example of that ridiculous rule in action.

For what reason Elite?

Dunno...I am not a admin. But there have been similar threads in the past. One which I remember had people posting the exact bot check and the creator of the thread got fined....if I remember correctly. I do know it got closed tho.

Sounds like some foolish April folly from Elite :)

iirc, the reason it was closed and people fined is that a random bot-check generator does not have a filter.

as intelligent beings, most of us do have a filter and if you choose to ignore yours then pay the consequences.

Haha if you like I can sift through 300+ threads looking for it :P.

there was several closed since ive been here like this

Yes please :)

Looks like I am not the only one with a good memory. <3 Tal :).

Dude, tell that to Chaucer! :P

Examples of sexual innuendo and double-entendre occur in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales.

Here is one I found. There has been at least one more that I can remember.

http://www.carnageblender.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002cZw&all_p=1

That wasn't locked though, was it? Just closed either out of time, or at the request of the OP and others in the thread.

But now you mention that thread, I'd be keen to hear what the offending Botcheck was! :P

Jeez, get a better example than that......

been there, read it and enjoyed the hell out of it. i am unsure of the relevance though as the canterbury tales never billed itself as a pg web site?

GL, isn't innuendo an Italian suppository?

i am not saying that i think this thread should be closed. i would like a clearcut ruling though before i post the best ones i have as i also remember issues in the past.

is it allowed? is it allowed without a supporting pic? (if this is the case then we just see who can come up with the dirtiest combination since no proof that it has happened is required)
is it allowed but only with a supporting image?

until we get a ruling i will hold back on posting my best ones from the years! ; )

LoL G!

Maybe it's becuase I was raised with Double Entendres as a staple of childhood comedy. From Up Pompey to all of the 'Carry On' line (with a little Viz and Finbar Saunders thrown in).

Double Entendres were the way to have some 'adult' fun, in a pre watershed PG environment.

Pfft Dude, CM them to me! :P

bed // many

C'mon now, we all know people don't get fined anymore...

But there are tons of !48s. Oh, wait...

Maybe it's because the admins don't have 400+ people to monitor.

I would sooo prove Hatch wrong if I weren't worried about sailing clear past the 'fined' territory and into the 'reset/banned territory'.