Protection Q: (in General)
so just to clarify that final detail. Does this mean that with my current Protection: @ 1,826 (5) the 5= a -5% decrease in dmg taken? so for example a melee blow of 100 would actually be 95?
thx for future feedbacks :d
February 2 2005 5:51 AM EST
IMHO it's 0,21% per point = 1,05% dmg decrease/Minion.
February 2 2005 6:55 AM EST
AC takes .21% damage reduction per point. (so 100 AC = 21% less damage)
protection then also takes .21% per point (or so people say) so protection (50) takes 10,5% from the remaining damage you take.
So (If protection reduces damage in the same way as AC) Protection is multiplicative with AC and not addative? (Like CB1)
February 2 2005 8:50 AM EST
AC, Protection, Endurance - in this order. Check the FAQ for more detailed information.
February 2 2005 9:27 AM EST
Protection is separate from AC now. There would be no reason to have it separate if it worked the same way as it used to - the 0.21% reduction per point. It's a good starting point, but I seriously doubt that it's correct. Why separate it out if it hasn't changed what it's doing?
February 2 2005 9:45 AM EST
If I'm not mistake Alumuric, AC blocks first, then protect blocks what's left
ie, if you have AC of 100, it will block ~20% of damage, letting 80% go through. The Protection then kicks in and reduces it by a percentage of the remaining damage.
Meaning, protection's effect has been toned down.
AC 100 + Prot 100 (yeah right) used to mean damage reduction of ~40% (200 x .20
Now, Ac 100 blocks 20, letting 80% go through, now the protection blocks 20% of the 80%, or 16% for a net effect of 36%.
Then again, Jon's documentation is mediocre at best, so I could be way off.
February 2 2005 9:47 AM EST
My documentation is excellent. :)
February 2 2005 10:06 AM EST
I understand how it works, Todd, I just doubt that it's still 0.21% per point. It would be easy enough to figure out, statistically. Get a whole bunch of EXP saved up, fight 20 people and record damages, then learn a big Prot and fight the same 20 again. Should be able to make a good guess at it then.
February 2 2005 12:42 PM EST
I just had base protection (5), but when I trained it for my guys it started saving around 5% of damage from attacks, not 1% or so. Could be wrong - this was eyeballed.
btw where did this .21% derive from?
February 2 2005 10:45 PM EST
The 0.21% was derived from CB1.
Every point of AC reduced the damage you took by 0.21% in CB1. People are just assuming the same trend carried over, but I am skeptical that this is the case.
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=001BUY">Protection Q:</a>