amf should i bother or not. (in General)


[-war-] April 28 2005 6:17 PM EDT

i like amf i know its usefull especialy for the targets im going to face even now but to have u all understand my setup here it is

4 minions and a Toj
GS,Haste,AS,EC

Right now this setup is great if I face tanks, but in the long run im not sure if I should do amf because I'm not sure if there will still be DD minions/familiars trying to compete with tanks because of amf. On the other hand mages might have free reign once the tanks stop doing into amf and become beaten by mages with some suprise attack heh. So anyone know if i should put amf into my 3 minions or should I just keep training it all as i have now and not touch amf and will not do va then. I just want to keep it balanced right now.

QBRanger April 28 2005 6:23 PM EDT

IMO,

Without AMF your Toast to mages. You have to have AMF to face mages when you get to the upper levels of PR. AMF is great in that it has 2 effects. The first is reflection of damage back to the cast injuring them and the other is, of course, less damage to you.

[-war-] April 28 2005 6:25 PM EDT

yes but the point of my post is asking if i should just make myself anti tank or am i gonna have to do anti tank and anti mage it ends up splitting the exp into both ways heh.

slurpz April 28 2005 6:51 PM EDT

for extreme anti-tank...look at Sacredpeanut's character (A Melon Named Harold)

[-war-] April 28 2005 8:00 PM EDT

that one will die easy to taking hits, i could probably kiill him without his toj hehe/

BrandonLP April 28 2005 8:55 PM EDT

That's the point. Harold can kill off large tanks with ease and make extremely good rewards doing so, yet, he's vulnerable to everything else. Such is the rock/paper/scissor cycle of CB.

Mags April 28 2005 9:54 PM EDT

Please don't emulate the Peanut.
This thread is closed to new posts. However, you are welcome to reference it from a new thread; link this with the html <a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=001JW2">amf should i bother or not.</a>