Grant
February 17 2006 6:38 PM EST
A UC(10) does more damage than an ELS(x11), on average. That would imply it has a bigger base damage.
And I wanted to start a post whose title begins 'Interesting:' without it being a thinly disguised call to action. **cough** Ranger **cough** Vanyard **cough**
:)
Thanks to Shadowsparkle for lending the x11 ELS that made this possible.
very interesting, what was STR on the testing char?
Grant
February 17 2006 6:46 PM EST
73
I'm keeping the same testing character for all my tests.
How many attacks were used to get the average?
Undertow
February 17 2006 6:50 PM EST
Were they all against base stat un-armored enchanter types?
Grant
February 17 2006 7:07 PM EST
Absolutely, unless fission has added armor in the last couple days, just to thwart me.
(joke).
AdminShade
February 17 2006 10:02 PM EST
cool, keep me informed about the details :)
PirateKing
February 17 2006 11:42 PM EST
I don't like all this micro analyzing of UC. You people are just daring Jon to meddle with it. Leave us UC'ers alone. :P
"Go home people. Move along. There is nothing to see here!"
NSFY
February 17 2006 11:53 PM EST
TEH UC MUST BEH NERFTED!?!??! it si ofterbalANc3d >_
Grant
February 17 2006 11:59 PM EST
Oh and, um, does anyone have one of the following they can lend me monday:
x1 or x11 BoNE
x1 or x11 MH
lol, I'm famous! Mentioned right by Ranger! As bad as it sounds, it is kind of nice to be referenced and acknowledged. Of course, don't remind me of the reasons or you'll kill my positive mood ;)
Oh, and very interesting information. Maybe the unloved tank child of CB2 will gain some more love with all the latest discoveries and revelations about it.
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=001i8x">Interesting: UC bigger base than ELS</a>