Rawr
April 1 2009 5:36 AM EDT
As of now, the only way to unlearn a spell is to unlearn the whole thing, taking the exp hit (98% for spells, 95% for intrinsics I think). Anyways, why isn't there a partial unlearn? There isn't much to clarify with how it would work because its a simple idea... but what are the reasons that we DON'T have it?
Daz
April 1 2009 5:39 AM EDT
To punish you for wanting to change your strategy.
Rawr
April 1 2009 5:42 AM EDT
Fair enough. But with new items and changemonths and whatnot, surely Jon wants some flexibility for our strategies..
QBRanger
April 1 2009 7:52 AM EDT
This is an idea that has been brought up numerous times in the past.
And you can see the result of things.
Flamey
April 1 2009 7:52 AM EDT
That's why untrain penalties were reduced a lot.
[P]Mitt
April 1 2009 3:02 PM EDT
You do have flexibility in your strategies. The simple cost is 2% of your exp.
ScY
April 1 2009 3:11 PM EDT
But things with benefits should have no opportunity cost!
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002hvd">Partial Unlearns?</a>
