AoJ's give 90% chance of junction when not named and 100% when named.
Right?
AdminShade
July 24 2009 2:34 AM EDT
Not sure if this has been activated yet, might as well try ;)
well, I have a named AoJ and item effects seemed to junction over to my familiar every fight when I was using it.
I don't know if this is the same for unnamed AoJs.
SK you are correct, but it is only 90% of the effect transfered over not a 9 in 10 chance of item effects. The only outstanding case is the HoC i believe
AdminShade
July 24 2009 2:48 AM EDT
"and item effects seemed to junction over to my familiar every fight when I was using it."
Item effects do always junction over with a non named AoJ, but at 90% of their maximum power, not 100%. So your observation is correct, though worded incorrect.
So if I had a named AoJ, the effects would be at 100% power?
I thought AoJs were supposed to work the way Junction did, and Junction gave a percent chance of transferring item effects over to a familiar.
Hasn't been turned on yet...
Naming an AoJ is useless.
Right?
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002pjA">AoJ naming</a>
