As a change month. Should we change what we think is...
a) Lower the overpowered.
b) Buff the weak
c) a and b.
d) Change nothing, everything works well. All I want is a new supporter, a new spell and a new car.
I would have to say b. I don't really see all that much as being very over powered but there are clearly some things that need some help.
I agree with Nem, b cause there are ways to counter the overpowered stuff but if an aspect of the game is too weak, it just sucks.
September 6 2009 10:47 AM EDT
I say D.
I'd say B. It will almost be like D as people try to make new, effective strategies with the changes.
September 6 2009 11:05 AM EDT
I am not a guru here so take this with a grain of salt, but it seems if RoBF, and Hal dex and ?? were lowered - it would be easier. (since they are selling for a premium) But buffing items is fine. I don't really care. Whatever works. I guess - C. But can I have a new car anyway?
It would be silly to buff everything back up so that GA isn't doing too much. The best answer is to buff what needs buffing (GoM, etc) and nerf what needs to be nerfed (GA, etc).
With the aim of reaching overall balance.
September 6 2009 12:03 PM EDT
B there are a lot of useless things in this game that were not intended to be..or nearly useless...variety is nice. :-)
September 6 2009 12:08 PM EDT
make it D, but with an house and a pick-up truck instead of the car...:)
but as a changemonth, surprise us ! go CB go !
EH (Slightly, the other options are better in many cases.), GoMs...maybe the MenC and VB (Slightly. A MenC/GoM buff would take care of the VB.) Stat enhancing spells. I would be able to list more, but the ones above I have experienced with.
e, everyones opinion on what is weak and what is OP is different. Just correct the inbalance
September 6 2009 2:12 PM EDT
I will agree with Obama on this.
However, what one person sees as underpowered or balanced, another can see as overpowered.
Where does one see imbalance then?
"I will agree with Obama on this."
I didn't think I'd ever see Ranger say this...
But I agree with Ranger. If something is grossly over/underpowered, then it can be fixed. But if something's close to being balanced (such as the RoBF, imo), it should be left alone until the grossly imbalanced things (GoM/MenC being one example) are dealt with. Then a possible imbalance can be dealt with.
September 6 2009 5:55 PM EDT
Tweak the things that need to be tweaked, in either direction, rather than trying to hide what's broken by changing everything around it.
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html