Atleast I can "Like" it, right? (in Links)

AdminQBVerifex June 14 2010 1:45 PM EDT

TheShazbot June 14 2010 2:05 PM EDT

Ugh, don't remind me about the huge step back that Blizzard is taking

Eurynome Bartleby [Bartleby's] June 14 2010 2:22 PM EDT

So B.net wins, huh? Unfair comparison! Stone should be getting an extra check mark since it cannot be hacked into. So they're at least both equal!

Ugh, Blizzard fanboys. Stone 4ever!

AdminShade June 14 2010 2:25 PM EDT

A stone can be hacked into, with a big axe :D

A stone however, can be thrown away, Blizzard cannot...

Eurynome Bartleby [Bartleby's] June 14 2010 2:36 PM EDT

Lies of the mainstream gaming industry!

Cube June 14 2010 7:17 PM EDT

Look how far we've come.

A Lesser AR of 15 [Red Permanent Assurance] June 15 2010 12:19 AM EDT

Let he is without SIN podcast with stone.

This thread is closed to new posts. However, you are welcome to reference it from a new thread; link this with the html <a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0033pi">Atleast I can "Like" it, right?</a>