Sickone
December 16 2011 12:30 PM EST
As it's been pointed out somewhere else, since it does not ever grow, the reasoning behind not allowing growing tattoos in rentals does not apply to it, so it should be possible to rent it out.
Anybody opposed ? And if opposed, why ?
The only thing I can guess is that it's hard to allow one type of tattoo through. Right now, all tattoos are blanketly banned.
I am not aware of a conceptual reason why those particular tattoos shouldn't be rented.
Sickone
December 16 2011 12:52 PM EST
So it's just a technical problem then ?
QBRanger
December 16 2011 1:04 PM EST
I think that was the same reason Jon gave us so long ago.
This thread is closed to new posts.
However, you are welcome to reference it
from a new thread; link this with the html
<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=003G5Y">Allowing the RoE in rentals.</a>