February 25 2009 3:56 PM EST
February 25 2009 4:01 PM EST
Read the linked forum thread.
It is quite clear.
February 25 2009 4:04 PM EST
Ranger, I am DoS. I don't need explained to thanks. My comment was to the author.
today is the last day of my nub let me know when you ready
Then perhaps you should have said, "ok, Tal" instead of "what? o.O", DoS...
Ranger was just trying to help since you seemed surprised/confused.
February 25 2009 11:26 PM EST
How did Ranger's post help? Obviously he read it and had a question about it, Ranger's post was unnecessary and didn't help solve anything, #2
February 25 2009 11:28 PM EST
"How did Ranger's post help? Obviously he read it and had a question about it, Ranger's post was unnecessary and didn't help solve anything, #2"
I was stating that instead of questioning, read the link. Everything that was needed to be known was in that link.
Your post, on the other hand, did nothing to help this thread.
February 25 2009 11:29 PM EST
"Obviously he read it"
It was certainly not obvious to me, therefore my reply.
February 25 2009 11:31 PM EST
you won't lure me into another pointless bicker battle, he obviously read the link and had a personal question about it to Tal. Telling someone to reread something that they don't get in the first place is pointless.
February 25 2009 11:49 PM EST
I also wish not to get into a battle with you.
But it was not obvious to me he read the link. Your logic, therefore, fails since you assumed EVERYONE knew he read it.
Saying absolutes is not the way to win any logic battle since there are few absolutes in the world.
Please be more careful next time.
February 25 2009 11:52 PM EST
No Ranger, the logic thing isn't going to fly here... instead of writing something that is completely irrelevant how about trying to explain it? Telling someone to re-read a complex calculus question (for logical example) that they don't understand won't help in anyway unless you explain the steps involved on how to solve it.
February 25 2009 11:53 PM EST
I agree with Ranger. If DoS knew what was going on in the thread, then why bother asking "what?" indicating he was confused. And if he HAD read the thread, there'd be no reason for confusion.
kevlar, if DoS and Ranger have an issue, it is THEIR issue. Please stop being a forum troll; I know you love it, but it's just not becoming of you.
February 25 2009 11:56 PM EST
Sorry I am not being a troll :) Telling someone to re-read something they don't get is utterly pointless.
February 26 2009 12:01 AM EST
We did not assume he read it in the first place, like you did.
Are we able to assume he did not read it, like you assumed he did?
Or is your thinking the only possible right way?
February 26 2009 12:02 AM EST
Ranger why are you now saying "We"? And why does what you assume grant you the right to post what you think is right when in essence you should have just left your 2 cents out of it?
February 26 2009 12:04 AM EST
Both of you should leave your two damn cents out of someone else's PR thread! Stop this senseless argument NOW!
For the love of all that is good and holy....
You guys are insane.
I'm considering not locking the thread so that you can instead get yourselves forum banned.
Take that as advice, or as a warning. Your choice.
Rangers' "We" includes me.
Anyway tal if dos has forgotten or doesnt need you to run him an ncb perhaps you'd be willing to run one for me. =).
I agree with Ranger, I assumed the same thing. /me swings a bat at the "Don't feed troll" sign.
February 26 2009 12:07 AM EST
I got dibs on the next NCB he does :)
February 26 2009 12:46 AM EST
My reply was because I was told he would be unable to do it. @ #3's first post, that would make #2 a troll as well. I had read it and I even posted in the thread.
This is pretty much why I don't read forums anymore.
February 26 2009 12:59 AM EST
troll troll troll... has this become World of Warcraft forums?
February 26 2009 2:10 AM EST
stop trolling Rawr!!! :p
This thread is closed to new posts.